The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

`Tlice-(Presitfent -- cEdtfi Warner 604-980-5358 warnere@ca.inter.net Our recent jurying saw the adjudication of 213 paintings of which 107 were chosen for exhibition. Extended and staggered arrival times worked very well reduced queues and reduced some chaos. information emailed in advance saved time that evening and we also had an opportunity to test an improved process for photography, which eliminated the need for retakes the next day. MAY2006 JURYING RESULTS Here is a chart showing how the marks broke better was required to get into one of the shows. Also below are the jurors' comments. As a result of these comments we will look to offering more intermediate courses next year covering drawing, colour theory, composition, and technique. out. A total score of 4 out of 8 or N2% T -----u wj I E 2345171' jacoouToFIJ Mike Svob Overall some very good work and many respectable pieces. There was a great range of subject matter and/or style or treatment of the subject matter. Need more time developing the idea or composition. Less labour on the paint application. Keep the framing simple. Stuart Slind Subject matter tended to be too conservative ie: old barns, sunsets etc. Often there were good compositions that were lost in poor framing and or poor technique. A few more classes or instruction should be taken by those with lower marks before they enter competitions so they don't get discouraged. Congratulations to the award winners from this jurying who are: Ferry Building Alannah Haynes Peggy's Cove Jurors' Choice